Public Service Alliance of Canada
 | Home  | Site Map  | Contact Us  | Bargaining  | Search  | Join Our Union  | Français  |

Receive the News by E-mail

First Name:

Last Name:

E-mail:


Unsubscribe?

RCMP category of employee project
Fight for your rights

PSAC is concerned that the actions proposed by the RCMP will prejudice the interests of our members

November 6, 2002

The Honourable Lucienne Robillard
President of the Treasury Board
L’Esplanade Laurier, 9th Floor
140 O’Connor Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0R5 

Dear Ms. Robillard:  

            Over the past two years, 3,500 employees of the Treasury Board of Canada who work for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) have been targeted by a proposal to restructure employee categories within the RCMP. The end result may mean loss of their status as unionized employees belonging to the broader public service of Canada.  

            I am greatly concerned that the actions proposed by the RCMP will prejudice the interests of our members and feel you should have my views on the full implications of this action. 

            The Category of Employees Project was initiated by the RCMP who extensively used the services of consultants Deloitte Touche to identify options for employee category simplification. In our view, none of the options produced by the consultant gave full and fair consideration to the rights of affected employees. It is also clear, that these options grossly underestimate the public policy implications and the impact of the legislative changes required for implementation. They also appear to fly in the face of the commitment made by you to the National Joint Council with regard to the right of federal public service employees to maintain their union representation. 

            It is ironic that the mandate that Deloitte and Touche received from the RCMP was to develop options, and make a recommendation that would necessitate the least legislative change possible. The option that Deloitte and Touche has recommended, Option 3, which envisages the consolidation of Public Service Employees and Civilian Employee categories of the RCMP would, if implemented, require extensive legislative changes to the RCMP Act to the Public Service Staff Relations Act and the Public Service Employment Act.  

            This initiative, coming as it does during a period of legislative reform in the public service, raises the question of how the legislative process for the RCMP will affect the current government’s efforts to bring about public service reform.  

            The RCMP Category of Employees project is a serious departure from public policy in that it will take thousands of PSE employees out of the federal public service and will effectively strip them of the right of union representation despite the fact that 64% of the non represented civilian employees of the RCMP do the same work as PSEs, and are remunerated at rates of pay pegged to the rates negotiated by the public service unions.  

            Given the gravity of this action and its departure from the policy and practice of this government, the Public Service Alliance of Canada will be left with no alternative but to mobilize its full resources both in the political arena, in Parliament and in the workplace to draw attention to misguided recommendations of Deloitte Touche. 

            I request a meeting in the very near future with you and your officials to review the actions proposed by the RCMP and their probable impact on labour management relations in the public service of Canada.

Sincerely,

 Nycole Turmel
 National President


Treasuty Board's response:

December 17, 2002

Dear Ms. Turmel:

            Thank you for your letter dated November 6, 2002, regarding the proposal to restructure employee categories within the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).

            I understand, from discussions between officials of the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) and those of the RCMP, that the project to restructure the current employee category system is ongoing and that no final decisions have been made. I also understand that senior RCMP management have asked their project leaders for additional information with regard to the implications of the consultant’s recommendations. Therefore, a meeting at this time would appear premature.  

            However, as this project unfolds and additional information is gathered and analysed by the project leaders, TBS officials will consult with you as we continue to work with the RCMP in supporting both their operational goals, as well as fairness to employees. 

            Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention.

Sincerely, 

[Original signed by]

Lucienne Robillard

Home    Site Map    Contact Us    Negotiations  
  Join us    Search    Français

Page updated: 07/04/03