The Work Reorganization ProgramReport to the
Senior Advisory Stakeholder Committee
December 1, 1999
Wave Three Findings
Civilian Labour Adjustment in National
Defence Research Project
Executive Summary
This document presents the third report of findings of the longitudinal
Civilian Labour Adjustment in National Defence (CLAND) study.
The objective of the CLAND study is to investigate the impacts, over time, of
the downsizing in the Department of National Defence on affected employees.
Civilian workers who were offered the Department’s special departure incentive
are being tracked over a four-year period in order to examine their
socio-economic and labour market experiences.
The impacts and experiences to be tracked focus on several theme areas. In
the first issue, special emphasis was given to individuals’ experience with
the Civilian Reduction Program (CRP) and internal workforce adjustment processes
used to administer the downsizing. Beginning at Wave Two and continuing here,
the focus of attention shifts more towards the external labour market and
socio-economic experiences of affected employees as well as the many factors
influencing those outcomes.
The research methodology adopted in the study incorporates a longitudinal
design featuring multiple waves of data collection consisting of an initial
baseline interview and regular contacts over the subsequent three and a half
years. The study population includes all individuals who have received letters
of offer between September 1994 and August 1996, regardless of departure
decision. By tracking the experiences of both departing employees and those who
remain, it is possible to compare the outcomes and experiences of the two
groups.
The Wave Three sample consisted of 1467 respondents. Included in that number
were 823 participants who had provided information at both the three- and
nine-month intervals as well as 644 respondents from Cohort 1a who were first
contacted nine-months after they were offered the buyout package.
The response to the study continues to be encouraging. Among those
individuals who were eligible to participate, and whom the interviewers were
able to contact for an interview at the twenty-one month interval, the response
rate was 90 percent – only ten percent refused to participate in the study.
Various other forms of non-response contributed to an overall reduction in the
sample from 1906 cases at Wave Two to the present number.
Extending almost two years from the time individuals were offered the CRP and
including up to three reference points in time, the Wave Three data provide the
first real opportunity to detect significant longitudinal impacts in the
adjustment process. In particular, the twenty-one month interval captures CRP
recipients at an interesting and critical point in their post-departure
experience.
Key Findings
A brief summary of the key findings from the third wave of data collection is
presented below. More detailed information on these and other findings are
contained in the main body of the report.
Respondents’ satisfaction with their initial decision whether to accept
or decline the CRP remains high at 5.7 (on a scale ranging from 1 to 7); a
slight erosion is, however, noted across time particularly among CRP-takers
who are unemployed.
The results also indicate progress in the placement of surplus employees
(directed-offer decliners) into new, indeterminate positions; the extent of
placement has increased to almost 60 percent after twenty-one months.
Respondents continue to report a high degree of commitment to their work
despite significantly lower levels of morale and substantial increases in
workload. Approximately 70 percent of employees indicated an increase in their
workload over the past year.
Utilization of the CRP training allowance increased over waves as more CRP
takers exited the public service. Of those employees who accepted the CRP and
had not withdrawn from the labour force, 65 percent have received training
funded under this provision. Instruction in computers remained by far the most
common training area, cited by approximately 40 percent of respondents.
Retirement stands as the largest single labour market outcome, with 40
percent of respondents who have left National Defence under the CRP
identifying it as their current employment status.
A modest but steady increase is noted in the proportion of CRP takers
reporting employment, from 20 percent at Wave One to 28 percent at Wave Three.
Only 12 percent are, however engaged in regular full-time work (including
contract employment), part-time and self-employment accounting for the
balance.
Unemployment is reported by 25 percent of CRP recipients, higher among
individuals in the middle age groupings (35-44, 45-54).
Sixty percent of the former DND employees who did not retire report having
applied for Employment Insurance benefits; of those who had applied, 42
percent were receiving EI at the time of the Wave Three interview.
Among those engaged in salaried or contract employment, personal contacts
proved to be the most reliable means of landing a job, cited by 45 percent of
working respondents.
CRP takers who were employed averaged $505 per week, considerably less than
the mean wage of $710 reported by those who declined the CRP and remain
employees of National Defence. There were no significant differences in weekly
earnings based on type of employment.
A clear gulf persist in the perceptions of economic circumstances between
CRP recipients and decliners; CRP takers are significantly more likely to
identify economic improvements. Longitudinal analysis provides evidence that
the gap between CRP takers and decliners has steadily diminished over time.
Remaining DND employees are still roughly three times more likely to report
a decline in economic circumstances than to identify an improvement in this
area.
Respondents’ rating of their health remained positive, averaging 5.6 on a
seven-point scale; longitudinally a slight but steady decline is noted in
respondents’ visits to health care professionals. Unemployed respondents
reported the highest level of contact with health professionals, surpassing
even retirees.
Results from a series of focus groups conducted with the spouses of CRP
recipients are integrated into the Wave Three report. Among the themes
emerging from the dialogue with spouses are an indictment of the DND work
environment during the CRP period, modest impacts experienced by the large
number retiring from the workforce, and more significant emotional and
financial impacts registered by the smaller portion of recipients seeking
re-employment.
Introduction
The Wave Three findings represent the third complete report of the CLAND
longitudinal research project. It provides a summary of the respondents’
adjustment experience at twenty-one months from the receipt of a departure
incentive offer issued under the Civilian Reduction Program.
Previous reports described the baseline picture (Wave One Report: December
1997) and the early labour market outcomes experienced by respondents upon
departure from their affected positions within National Defence (Wave Two
Report: December 1998).
At the period of twenty-one months from time of offer, all departing or
surplus employees have vacated their public service positions and are a
considerable distance into the post-departure adjustment process. The Wave Three
data, therefore, yield a more concrete representation of the labour market
outcomes of CRP recipients than did initial results described in the preceding
report.
A key feature in the design of the CLAND study is its longitudinal dimension.
The ability to track affected employees over several years allows researchers to
identify potential patterns in the adjustment story and assess outcomes at
different intervals. Possessing three points of reference for a large proportion
of the sample, analysis of the 21-month data set provides the first bonafide
opportunity to investigate those longitudinal aspects. Throughout the report,
instances of significant longitudinal findings will be highlighted.
As a compliment to the quantitative respondent data, the CLAND project
conducted a series of focus groups with spouses of CRP recipients in four
metropolitan centres. These discussions probed spouses’ impression of the
impacts of departure on the employees and their families. Conducted in the
Spring of 1998, the focus group results correspond to a point in time roughly
equivalent to the 21-month interval and are incorporated into this report.
Project Background
In February of 1994, as part of its annual budget release, the federal
government announced drastic personnel reductions scheduled for the Department
of National Defence (DND). The following year further cuts were identified. In
total, the elimination of 13,500 DND civilian positions was specified in
consecutive federal budgets. To facilitate the reductions, the Department of
National Defence introduced a special one-time departure incentive package for
its indeterminate employees - the Civilian Reduction Program (CRP).
The CRP distinguished between two principal types of departure offers. Type
A, known as directed offers, were received by employees occupying positions
specifically targeted for elimination through the discontinuance of a function
or the closure of a unit. Type B, known as group offers, were delivered to a set
of employees occupying similar positions in a particular unit and/or
occupational category from which a fixed proportion of positions were to be
eliminated.
The CRP would serve as the model for a broader incentive program applied
across the federal public service as part of the government’s "program
review" process. Developed by the federal Treasury Board Secretariat, the
Early Departure Incentive (EDI) and Early Retirement Incentive (ERI) packages
were used to eliminate 45,000 positions from the federal workforce. A small
percentage of study participants in Cohort 2 were recipients of this later
incentive package.
The reductions prompted the Union of National Defence Employees to propose a
research project that would track the individual-level outcomes of affected
workers over a number of years and objectively assess the impacts of the buyout
program. In July 1995, the union launched a multi-partite research project in
collaboration with the Department of National Defence, Treasury Board
Secretariat (TBS), Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC), and the Public
Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC). The objective of the CLAND study would be to
investigate the longitudinal impacts of the downsizing in the Department of
National Defence upon affected civilian workers. It would examine the labour
market and non-labour market outcomes of both departing employees and
"survivors", those workers who remain in the employment of the federal
government.
Methodology
The Questionnaire
The longitudinal research design of the CLAND study called for the basic
structure of the Wave One questionnaire to remain intact across successive waves
of interviews. The substantive content of that instrument was formulated to
advance the specified research objectives. The body of the questionnaire was
organized around several theme areas (as described in the following chart):
At each subsequent wave of data collection several minor modifications were
made to the instrument. Among the Wave Three changes were: accommodation for the
presence of ERI/EDI recipients within the second cohort; work-related
psychological measures were dropped for retirees; questions on the utilization
of social safety net were added for CRP recipients; and provision made for
collecting data on sequential employment.
A significant amount of effort was also required to modify the skip logic
embedded in the successive instruments to ensure the appropriate direction of
questions. An already complex instrument, designed to accommodate several
different types of respondents, was further complicated to adjust for the
contingencies stemming from respondents’ information provided at previous
waves.
Research Design
The research methodology adopted in the CLAND study incorporates a
longitudinal design featuring five waves of data collection. A process of
continuous sampling allowed for the entry of respondents into the sample on a
staggered basis, at a prescribed interval from the date they receive their CRP
offer. Following the initial baseline interview at three months, participants
are subsequently contacted at nine months, twenty-one months, thirty-three
months, and forty-five months from date of offer.
Two distinct cohorts have been designated, based on the receipt date of their
letter-of-offer. The first cohort consists of individuals affected prior to the
July 15, 1995 amendments to the Workforce Adjustment Directive (WFA) whereas the
second cohort involves those employees receiving letters after the amendments
came into force. The July 15th cleavage is critical since it marks a
fundamental change to the discretionary complexion of the CRP. The elimination
of job guarantees contained in the WFA amendments severely limit employees’
alternatives to acceptance of the CRP.
A further division is created within Cohort 1. The June 1995 launch date of
the CLAND project prevented the researchers from obtaining three-month data for
a large proportion of the Cohort 1 population. Rather than exclude this segment
of affected employees completely, it was decided that individuals receiving
letters of offer prior to March 1995 would be first contacted at nine months
from time of offer. Consequently, these respondents will only participate in
four waves of data collection.
How
The Sample Was Constructed
The target population for the CLAND study was all civilian employees of DND
who received a special departure incentive offer. An administrative database
maintained by DND, the Civilian Reduction Program Information System (CRPIS),
constituted the sampling universe for our purpose. Excluded from the sample at
the outset were management category employees, individuals for whom there was
insufficient contact information, individuals offered the CRP prior to September
1994, and individuals whose records lacked an open date (the date they received
their letter-of-offer). The high level of attrition due to these exclusions
necessitated a census approach to sampling in which attempts were made to
contact all cases with sufficient tracking information.
The original research design called for 3000 interviews to be completed in
the initial wave of data collection, divided into two equal-sized cohorts of
1,500 respondents. Unfortunately, the generation of an adequate sampling frame
from which study participants could be recruited was made difficult by the
incomplete nature of the CRPIS; a large proportion of individual records present
in the database were missing the necessary information to permit interviewers to
establish contact.
The combined effect of poor contact information and the low volume of
eligible cases rendered the project unable to fully complete the second cohort
within a practical time-frame. As a result, a decision was taken in November
1996 to halt the initial formation of the second cohort at 810 cases. The
baseline targets for the other cohorts were met; their totals for the initial
contact were as follows: Cohort 1a (904 cases), Cohort 1b (638 cases).
Following the formation of the original sample, the sampling frame for each
subsequent wave of data collection becomes the respondents to the preceding
wave. In the case of Wave Three, for instance, the sampling frame consists of
respondents to Wave Two interview.
Table 1 illustrates the magnitude of the samples for the respective cohorts
as well as the attrition rate observed across each waves. In total 1467
interviews were conducted at the 21-month interval.
Table 1: Sample Size & Attrition Across Waves
|
Cohort |
Sample Size: Wave One |
Sample Size: Wave Two |
Sample Size: Wave Three |
|
One "A" |
n/a |
904 (n/a) |
644 (28.7) |
|
One "B" |
638 |
501 (21.5) |
387 (22.7) |
|
Two |
810 |
501 (38.2) |
436 (13.0) |
The response to the study continues to be encouraging. Ninety percent of
respondents who were contacted at the 21-month interval agreed to participate.
Only ten percent of the employees or former employees contacted refused to
participate in the study. The remaining cases were lost to attrition for a
variety of reasons (invalid telephone number, unable to contact, moved, dropped
after ten callbacks).
Our Sample
Table 2 presents the characteristics of the study’s sample at each of the
three completed waves in comparison to the DND civilian workforce and the
population from which the sample was drawn, namely the CRPIS. For this purpose
Cohort 1a participants are also included in the figures for Wave One.
Weighting formulas for occupation, cohort, and region variables were
developed by the survey administrator (Ekos Research Associates), to ensure the
Wave Three data-set was representative of the CRPIS population.
1complete CRPIS database for period ending August 1,1996
2 as of March 31,1994
Both the CRPIS and the CLAND sample diverge from the DND civilian workforce
in their age composition. Younger workers (those below 44 years of age) are
under-represented whereas employees over 55 years of age are significantly
over-represented relative to their presence in the DND civilian workforce.
No significant variation across waves is noted in the
composition of the sample with the exception of a slight shift in the
distribution across age bands. This is partially attributable to the ageing of
the sample as well as the greater mobility and attrition among younger
participants.
How the Survey was Administered
All interviews were conducted by Ekos Research Associates under contract to
the Union of National Defence Employees. The data collection techniques
described fully in the Wave One report have been maintained.
The original research design schedule called for each wave of data collection
to be completed over a period of approximately nine months. The difficulties
initially encountered in generating an adequate sampling frame for Wave One,
however, have resulted in sampling periods for each wave that are effectively
double in length. The total period for the Wave Three data collection extended
from September 1996 to July 1998.
Table 3 below illustrates the average duration between the date of offer and
the first three waves of interviews for each cohort. Overall the average point
of contact was 670 days (roughly 22 months) from time of offer.
Table 3: Average Distance Between Interview Date and Date of CRP Offer (in
days)
|
Cohort |
Wave One |
Wave Two |
Wave Three |
|
One "A" |
n/a |
281 |
681 |
|
One "B" |
107 |
303 |
663 |
|
Two |
132 |
294 |
660 |
|
Total |
121 |
290 |
670 |
Findings
The CRP Decision
The study’s population is civilian employees of National Defence who
received a letter-of-offer between September 1994 and August 1996. The decision
to sample on the basis of the receipt of a departure incentive offer allows the
project to track the outcomes of two groups: employees who accepted the CRP (or
its subsequent replacement ERI/EDI) as well as those employees who declined.
As indicated in previous reports, approximately three-quarters of respondents
opted to accept the buyout offer, while the remainder declined either a group
offer or a directed offer. The basic distribution along CRP type is consistent
across the three series of interviews. Despite the acceptance of the departure
incentive by a large majority of respondents, particularly in Cohort 2 where
take-up exceeded 95%, analysis of CRP decision type did reveal some interesting
distinctions. Compared to CRP takers, individuals electing to remain
departmental employees were more likely to be found in the mid-range of the age
categories (between 35 and 54) and located within the Technical occupational
grouping. Regionally, acceptance rates declined steadily from east to west with
Atlantic Canada reporting a high of 84% versus a low of 65% among residents of
the Pacific region.
Further examination of CRP decision type also demonstrated a significant
association with two psychological constructs: locus of control and anxiety.
Decliners were characterized by higher levels of anxiety and lower scores on a
scale measuring locus of control - the extent to which people attribute
responsibility for outcomes to internal factors.
The questionnaire contains two items developed to gauge individuals’
comfort with their decision. One probed their level of satisfaction with having
made the "right" decision while the second measured their propensity
to repeat their decision given the opportunity. These questions were combined
into a single measure of CRP decision satisfaction. Almost two years from the
event, most people maintained a high degree of satisfaction with their decision;
the average score reported was 5.7 out of a possible seven.
As expected, individuals’ current work situation was strongly related to
their appraisal of the departure decision; retirees reported the greatest degree
of satisfaction whereas the unemployed in the sample reported the least. Among
the other factors associated with the extent of satisfaction respondents felt
towards that decision were three psychological measures: anxiety, depression,
and locus of control. Individuals reporting high levels of social support were
also most comfortable with their decision.
CRP Decliners at 21 Months
The acceleration of large-scale downsizing across corporate North America
during the last fifteen years has caused organizations to focus increased
attention on the impacts experienced by the "survivors" - those who
remain as employees after the restructuring. This section of the report provides
an update on the circumstances of the "survivor" segment (those who
declined the incentive offer) of our sample at 21 months from the time of offer.
The survivor subset represents 23 percent of the overall sample (weighted) and
includes 331 cases: 233 who declined group offers and 98 who rejected directed
offers.
Where They Are
Twenty-one months following their receipt of a CRP offer, just under half of
the remaining employees (48.7%) remained in their same position. As expected,
most of the stability is attributed to employees who received group offers –
less than fifteen percent of the directed-offer decliners were still found in
their surplus positions.
For both group- and directed-offer decliners, mobility within the federal
public service is mostly confined to the Department of National Defence. Less
than eight percent of job changers found positions in a different department.
The Survivors’ View
Another set of questions related to the quality of the work environment in
the aftermath of organizational downsizing. Remaining employees were asked about
their levels of morale, workload, and commitment to their work. Respondents
continue to report a high degree of commitment to their work despite
significantly lower levels of morale and substantial increases in workload. This
basic pattern has remained consistent across the three waves.
Leadership within National Defence has been the subject of considerable
public scrutiny over its handling of a myriad of military and administrative
issues over the past five years. Employees were queried regarding their
assessment of the trustworthiness and commitment of senior management. In
general, employees were fairly critical on these two key dimensions of
leadership. Consistent with the Wave Two results, employees reported a low level
of trust in senior management and a poor rating of management’s commitment
towards the workforce. The only variation centers on the basis of gender: male
employees tended to express more harsh views of senior management than did their
female counterparts.
Surviving employees also continue to harshly rate the impact of the
downsizing on the work environment in National Defence. Almost three-quarters of
employees (72%) identified an overall negative impact as a result of the
reductions.
Three items measuring aspects of employee job satisfaction (satisfaction with
pay, satisfaction with benefits, and an overall measure) were first introduced
into the study at the time of the Wave Two survey. On 7-point rating scales
where seven signifies being "extremely satisfied", employees reported
moderate levels of satisfaction (4.9) with both non-salary benefits and overall
job satisfaction at the 21-month interval. Satisfaction with salary
compensation, however, scored much lower (3.8). While the first two measures
were also stable across time, a small but statistically significant decline
occurs in respondents’ satisfaction with salary from the Wave Two level. The
extension of a legislated wage freeze across the federal public service is
likely to have contributed to this drop.
CRP Takers at 21-months
The Civilian Reduction Program encouraged a large proportion of eligible
National Defence employees to voluntarily separate from the federal public
service. As mentioned earlier, amendments to the WFA Directive also severely
compromised employees’ alternatives to departure by eliminating the guarantee
of a reasonable job offer.
This section of the report documents the circumstances of CRP recipients at
twenty-one months from the time they were initially offered the buyout package.
At this interval, all respondents who accepted a buyout package had formally
departed National Defence.
Training Activities
The CRP included a training/education allowance which provided for a maximum
of up to $7,000 over four years for retraining towards employment outside the
federal public service. The training option has been liberally interpreted to
apply towards a broad variety of training activities. The CLAND questionnaire
contained ten questions dedicated to the utilization of the CRP training
allowance, focusing on training receipt, type, duration, and progress. The
cumulative survey results produced at Wave Three confirm the ongoing popularity
of the training allowance among CRP recipients.
Of those employees who accepted the CRP and had not withdrawn from the labour
force, 65 percent have received training funded under this provision. As
described in the previous reports, interest in training declines with age and
increases with educational attainment. At 21 months from time of offer, 42
percent report having completed their program of study while 55 percent of
individuals indicated that their training was still in progress.
Instruction in computers remained by far the most common training area.
Almost half of all respondents who received CRP-funded training pursued
instruction in desktop or personal computers. A disparate range of subject areas
accounted for the remaining balance: management/administration (8.9%),
vocational (7.4%), health sciences (6.5%) and engineering/technology (6.0%).
To ascertain the source of training delivery, a question was inserted into
the Wave Three instrument. Fourty percent of individuals participating in
training at the 21-month interval identify a private institution as their
training provider. Community colleges accounted for 35 percent followed by
universities (13%) and professional associations (6%).
The duration and intensity of the training programs tended to be highly
variable as indicated by the high standard deviations associated with the means
for both course length and hours per week. The average amount of time spent per
week in training was 16.6 hours (s.d.=14.2) while the total course length
averaged 25 weeks (s.d.=25.7). Training also appears to be largely a part-time
pursuit: less than 30 percent of respondents were enrolled in training involving
more than twenty hours per week. Training recipients also reflected positively
on the usefulness of their learning experiences. On a scale ranging from 1
"not at all useful" to 7 "extremely useful", an average
score of 5.5 was reported.
The ability to apply a portion of the $7000 allowance towards the purchase of
tools and equipment proved to be a preferred aspect of the program; two-thirds
reported making such investments. Information from Departmental training
officials indicates that computer equipment was the most popular type of
purchase noted.
Employment Status
To determine the labour market outcomes of employees departing National
Defence, the CLAND study identifies and tracks detailed characteristics of
individuals’ subsequent employment experience. Recognizing that displacement
from stable employment in the 1990s generally results in increased economic
insecurity marked by multiple jobs and sequential employers, the questionnaire
is designed to capture information from multiple jobs.
For both first job since departing DND and current job, employees were
questioned about their date of hiring, source of information leading to hiring,
type of work, industry, unionization, employment status, earnings, and job
satisfaction. A series of questions were also asked of individuals declaring
retirement, primarily focusing on the timing of their exit and the appearance of
any subsequent labour force participation.

An examination of labour market outcomes at the 21-month interval reveals the
relatively modest integration of departing DND employees into the external
labour force. As shown in Figure 5, only 12 percent of respondents who left
indeterminate positions at National Defence have secured full-time employment
(including contract employment). Smaller numbers have turned towards
self-employment (9.0%) and part-time work (6.8%). More striking is the extent to
which the National Defence departure program appears to have operated primarily
as an early retirement vehicle for civilian employees. Retirement stands as the
largest single disposition: 40 percent of sample respondents who left National
Defence under the CRP identify it as their current employment state.
Almost two years from the point at which they received their departure offer,
fully one-quarter of the former DND civilian employees are without work.
Although some of those reporting to be unemployed at the time of the Wave Three
interview had post-departure work experience, over half of the unemployed have
been without work since receiving the CRP.
Several factors were associated with employment outcomes. Specific groups of
workers were more likely to experience joblessness following their departure
from DND. Unemployment was highest among individuals in the lowest income
bracket (under $25,000), those coming from the Operational and Administrative
Support categories, and respondents from Atlantic Canada. Another variable that
has a significant impact on employment outcomes was age; unemployment was
highest among individuals found in the middle age categories (35-44 and 45-54
years of age) - roughly twice the level experienced by those under 35 years of
age. Interestingly, the receipt of training did not significantly increase the
likelihood of being employed at Wave Three.
Table 4: Labour Market Outcomes by Age
| |
Age
|
|
Status |
Under 35
% |
35 to 44
% |
45 to 54
% |
55 and over
% |
|
Working |
64.6 |
51.7 |
38.6 |
9.8 |
|
Unemployed |
17.8 |
32.6 |
35.8 |
18.3 |
|
Retired |
--- |
0.5 |
19.1 |
69.5 |
|
Other |
17.7 |
15.1 |
6.4 |
2.3 |
Total n
|
68 |
194 |
303 |
569 |
A new set of questions exploring individuals’ utilization of the Employment
Insurance (EI) program were introduced in the Wave Three survey (retirees were
excluded from this series of questions). EI regulations prohibit individuals
from receiving benefits during a period for which they receive a severance
payment. At twenty-one months from time of offer, most CRP takers unsuccessful
in finding work would have exhausted their severance period and become eligible
to receive EI benefits. Evidence of departing DND employees turning to the
social safety net for assistance is supported by the data. Sixty percent of
non-retiring CRP takers (n=672) had applied for EI since leaving National
Defence. Of those who applied, 42 percent were receiving unemployment insurance
at the time of the Wave Three interview. Characteristics of EI recipients mirror
the general profile of the unemployed in the sample; it was highest among women,
individuals between 35 and 54, and those possessing low skill portability. The
largest reason cited for not applying for EI was perceived ineligibility to
receive benefits.
In addition to youth, characteristics related to individuals’ human capital
were significantly associated with securing work. Enhanced rates of employment
were noted by those with educational achievement at or beyond the post-secondary
level and individuals from the Scientific/Professional category. CRP takers who
felt their skill set was highly portable were twice as likely to be employed
than were individuals assessing their skill portability as poor.
The large transition into retirement is consistent with the age profile of
the sample. Slightly over half of sample respondents were 50 years of age or
older at the time they were offered the CRP and the take-up rate was extremely
high (91.6%) among individuals in the "over 55" age category. Various
socio-economic factors were also associated with retirement. A higher incidence
of retirement is noted among high-income earners, workers in the Technical and
Administrative/Foreign Service categories, those lacking a high school diploma,
and among ex-military personnel.
As was reported in the Wave One report, approximately 80 percent of retirees
indicated that the program encouraged them to retire earlier than they had
planned. Despite the high numbers of employees moving into retirement ahead of
their personal schedules, very few report any employment activity, part-time or
otherwise, following their departure from National Defence. The proportion of
retirees claiming engagement in paid employment or operating their own
businesses has remained consistently around the five percent range across the
three waves.
Current Job
Individuals employed at Wave Three are grouped into three principal types of
employment relationships. Traditional wage employment (either full- or
part-time) is cited by 40 percent of the sample, followed by 34 percent claiming
self-employment and 26 percent engaged in contract work.
Despite the slight growth in the proportion of employed workers at the Wave
Three interval, little changed in the characteristics of "current job"
from what was initially reported at Wave Two. The nature of employment continues
to be diverse. The most common types of self-employment activities were in
retail and a broad "service industry" category, each accounting for
approximately 15 percent of the total, followed by construction (11.5%).
Individuals engaged in paid employment, either full-time or part-time, were also
broadly dispersed across a spectrum of industries with the "service"
category capturing just over a quarter of the group.
Most self-employment initiatives, approximately 80 percent, consist of small,
home-based or mobile operations featuring the respondent as the sole employee. A
closer examination of the self-employed workforce produced few significant
findings. Gender demonstrated a statistical association with males revealing a
moderately stronger inclination towards self-employment than did females. Older
workers and those with previous military experiences were also more likely to
report self-employment.
Among those engaged in salaried or contract employment, personal contacts
proved to be the most reliable means of landing a job, identified by 45 percent
of working respondents. Direct contact with employers contributed to 22 percent
of hirings followed by responding to newspapers ads (17%). Only four percent
identified the Canada Employment Centre as the source of information that led to
their employment.
The work week for respondents, including the self-employed averaged 33.7
hours, although the median was higher at 38 hours per week. Over half of the
respondents indicated a preference for their current allocation of hours, while
24 percent stated they would like to work more (down from 32 percent seeking
additional hours at Wave Two). Wages averaged $505 per week, considerably less
than the mean wage of $710 reported by those who declined the CRP and remain
employees of National Defence. There were no significant differences in weekly
earnings based on type of employment.
Another feature of the post-departure labour force participation is the loss
of union affiliation. Whereas 95 percent of the sample was covered by a
collective agreement in the public service, only 22 percent of those moving into
wage or contract employment are unionized.
Individuals’ assessment of their current job were derived from three
questions related to job satisfaction. Respondents were asked to comment on
their satisfaction with salary and non-salary benefits, as well as an overall
rating. As the comparison in Table 5 demonstrates, CRP recipients who are now
working tend to evaluate their new positions more favorably despite equal or
poorer ratings on two specific components of job satisfaction. This pattern,
which is unchanged from Wave Two, would seem to suggest either a bias towards
more favorable assessments of current situations to justify their decision to
leave or an indication that characteristics other than salary and benefits (such
as working conditions, organizational climate, and management styles) contribute
more to an overall measure of job satisfaction.
Table 5: Comparison of CRP Takers’ Satisfaction in Current versus DND Job
|
Satisfaction Item |
Rating of Current Job |
Rating of DND Job |
N |
|
salary benefits |
4.78 |
4.80 |
311 |
|
non-salary benefits |
3.77 |
5.75 |
256 |
|
Overall |
5.78 |
5.11 |
316 |
Analysis of the satisfaction variables generated few significant
associations. As expected individuals in traditional wage employment report the
highest level of satisfaction with non-salary benefits. This is related to the
general lack of benefits available to the self-employed and contract workers.
Skill portability was positively associated with individuals’ satisfaction
overall and in the area of salary. Interesting relationships noted between
employment type and certain psychological indicators paint an unpleasant
portrait of contract employees; they reported the lowest scores on happiness and
locus of control, together with the highest degree of anxiety.
Economic Conditions
Although there is evidence that some workers experience earnings gains
following involuntary departure (Ruhm,1991; Lauzon,1995), a greater body of
literature supports the argument that displacement generally results in income
decline extending over a considerable period of time (Jacobson et al,
1993,1993a; Hamermesh, 1989; Ontario Ministry of Labour,1993; Grayson,1985;
Ruhm,1992). Given this literature, we expect that individuals accepting the CRP
would experience economic decline over the long-term, notwithstanding the
short-term benefits of the generous buyout terms.
The questionnaire contained a series of questions designed to track changing
economic circumstances of the full sample. In addition to a three-item scale of
economic condition, individuals were asked about personal saving levels, any
requirement to cut back on important expenditures, and the burden of basic
housing expenses.

A general worsening of economic circumstances is reported by approximately
half the sample respondents. In particular, individuals report the greatest
decline in their ability to generate and maintain savings. Nonetheless,
two-thirds report no requirement to cut back on expenditures.
A key finding of the previous CLAND reports was the clear gulf in perceptions
of economic condition between CRP recipients and those who declined the offer.
At the 21-month interval, CRP takers remain significantly more likely to
identify economic improvement. The economic honeymoon enjoyed by CRP recipients
continues to provide a contrast to the decline cited among the
"survivor" group choosing to remain Departmental employees. The latter
group is still almost three times as likely to report a decline in economic
conditions than to have indicated an improvement in this area.
Among CRP takers, 41percent of employed respondents report improved economic
circumstances followed by 29 percent of both retirees and the unemployed. The
gulf between CRP takers and survivors is highlighted by the finding that the low
level of economic improvement (22%) reported by employees remaining at National
Defence trails even that of the unemployed.
Individuals’ social integration appears linked to their assessment of
economic circumstances. Increased levels of social and spousal support were
associated with an increased likelihood of reporting an improved economic
position. Psychological well-being also plays a role. Individuals with elevated
depression, stress, and fear of job loss are less likely to report an
improvement in economic circumstances as are those with a lower sense of an
internal locus of control.
Another measure associated with individuals’ perception of their economic
environment was an item that gauged employed respondents’ sense of job
security, specifically the likelihood of losing their job over the next few
years. Roughly sixty percent of respondents expressed an expectation that job
loss could be encountered in the relative near-term. Three-quarters of National
Defence employees in the sample indicated a high likelihood of layoff in
comparison to 44 percent of employed CRP recipients. Younger workers (under 35
years of age) were the least anxious as were employees drawn originally from the
Administrative Support category and individuals possessing a strong internal
locus of control.
Psychological Measures
Although unemployment often results from "economic down turns" and
"structural corrections in the market", the impact is usually felt at
a personal or psychological level. Unemployment and job loss are known risk
factors for poor mental health (Kessler et al., 1987; Liem & Liem 1988;
Weissman et al., 1991), most often manifested in the form of depression and
anxiety. The CLAND questionnaire included questions directly related to these
problems. To track possible changes in symptom levels over time, Wave One
questions were re-asked at the second and third interview occasions. At each
wave, depression was measured using a twelve-item scale, drawn from the General
Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and augmented with four additional questions. Anxiety
was measured by a condensed seven-item version of Spielberger's 1979 State Trait
Personality Inventory. In each measure, lower scores indicate reduced levels of
depression and anxiety.
Despite mental health concerns associated with unemployment, respondents at
Wave Three continued to report relatively low overall levels of depression and
anxiety, averaging 2.0 and 2.6 on a seven-point scale. Wave Three results also
show that only 6% of respondents are at risk of depression and 5% are at risk of
anxiety severe enough to impair daily activities. These figures compare
favorably with general population estimates which indicate 5% to 7% of adults
suffer from debilitating depression and approximately 6% to 9% suffer from
severe anxiety at any point in time.
Subgroup analyses show that the average levels of depression and anxiety
experienced differ by types of marital arrangements. Married and widowed
individuals reported lower levels of anxiety than single persons, while single
and divorced individuals experienced higher levels of depression than all other
partner arrangements. Results for depression and anxiety by employment status
indicate that unemployed individuals at Wave Three had significantly higher
depression levels than their employed counterparts. Those employed outside DND
reported the lowest anxiety levels, compared to those employed at DND, and those
who retired.
Qualitative information gained from the focus groups support this finding. A
number of participants maintained that their spouse’s departure from DND and
subsequent unemployment had directly contributed to depression and marital
problems. One participant put it this way:
As soon as that depression sets in they start picking on you. I have to
admit, I haven’t fought as much with my wife as I have since she lost her job.
We never really fought before, but we’ve had some pretty good ones, last year
in particular.
Others participants expressed similar difficulty dealing with their spouses’
depression. In another person’s words:
She would not even get out of bed. I had to encourage her to get up and take
a shower. After a while you start feeling pretty down yourself. You start
picking up her attitude. It was bringing me down. She would blow-up at me
because I was forcing her to get up and try to eat and motivate her again. You
feel like you should have done something to prevent this and you feel the blame
cast on you.
Income and age also influences depression and anxiety levels. Participants
with the lowest household income reported the highest depression and anxiety
levels, while middle-aged individuals (45 to 54 years) reported the highest
depression and anxiety compared to their more senior (55 years and older) and
younger age mates.
Like unemployment, quantitative findings for income are further substantiated
by qualitative information from spouses who attended the focus group session.
Many indicated that financial instability had caused their partners to become
depressed, and in a number of cases this depression had led to increased use of
alcohol. Other spouses reported that their partner’s job loss and precarious
financial situation had created great psychological suffering. As one focus
group member put it:
…leaving really affected her [mental] health, so she did some volunteer
work at the school. She got really depressed, she lost hope.
In addition to the mental health measures, the CLAND questionnaire included
several psychological constructs thought to influence adjustment outcomes. As
with depression and anxiety, these measures were asked across all three
interview occasions. At each wave, scales were constructed to measure the level
of respondent's locus of control, self-esteem, happiness, and work aspirations.
Leaving an established employment situation can be unsettling, whether the
change involves a new job, unemployment, or even retirement. An individual’s
belief in personal efficacy often influences his/her ability to successfully
manage these life changes. Locus of control is a measure that determines the
degree to which individuals believe they have influence over events or outcomes.
High scores on the locus of control scale reflect a belief that one has command
over events, while a low score suggests a belief that circumstances are
generally outside of one's control. Respondents at Wave Three reported an
average locus of control score of 4.5 on a seven-point scale, which remained
virtually unchanged from Wave Two.
Analysis across selected subgroups at Wave Three suggests many patterns that
parallel those seen in Wave Two. For example, college and university graduates
reported feeling more control than those who lacked a university degree. Workers
under 35 years of age report a significantly higher degree of control than older
workers.
Individuals employed outside DND recorded substantially higher locus of
control scores than respondents employed at DND, unemployed or retired
individuals. Data also indicated that CRP takers felt greater control than
decliners. Third interview data showed that personal and household income
significantly influences locus of control in that individuals with higher
incomes generally reported higher locus of control.
Self-esteem at Wave Three continued to be high amongst participants,
averaging 6.0 on a seven-point scale. This score is virtually unchanged from
Wave Two. As noted at Waves One and Two, those employed outside DND reported
significantly higher levels of self-esteem than workers at DND, the unemployed,
or retirees. Also consistent with Wave Two, the most recent data revealed no
significant differences of self-esteem across categories of age, gender,
education, region, or CRP type. In contrast to Waves One and Two, widowed
individuals at Wave Three showed lower average self-esteem scores than other
single or married participants. Moreover, Wave Three results indicate a
statistically significant increase in average level of self-esteem with
increasing levels of personal income. However, self-esteem scores only increase
until the fifty-five thousand dollar mark where they tend to flatten off,
suggesting that additional increments of income have little overall effect on
increasing self-esteem.
While overall self-esteem amongst study respondents was high, spouses who
participated in the focus groups provided a slightly different perspective,
especially those who felt financially burdened. A number of focus group members
indicated that loss of income had directly affected their spouse’s state of
mind, especially their self-esteem. As one member stated: "…my wife’s
self-esteem has plummeted and now it’s affecting her health." Moreover,
some of the focus group members felt that their own self-esteem had started to
suffer as a result of pressure to compensate for their spouse’s loss of
income: "...we have to worry about money and sometimes I feel like I’m
not being a good provider".
Study participants at Wave Three reported being very happy, averaging 5.8 on
a seven-point scale. Married individuals at the third interview where happier
than singletons, while the youngest and oldest respondents were happier than
middle-aged participants. Like the previous wave, the 21-month survey indicated
that those working outside DND were significantly happier than the unemployed,
those employed at DND and retirees. Women reported being happier than men and
participants with the lowest personal and household incomes were the least
happy. In contrast to Wave two findings, region showed no statistically
significant influence on respondent happiness.
The survey’s work aspiration measure is designed to tap into the extent to
which one receives personal fulfillment and challenge through their daily work
activities. Consistent with the previous results, participants at Wave Three
report that they derive a significant level of satisfaction from their work,
averaging 6.0 on a seven-point scale. More fine-grained analysis at Wave Three
indicates that individuals employed outside DND reported higher levels than the
unemployed and those working at DND. The 21-month data also show that women have
slightly higher levels of aspiration than men, a pattern seen with Wave One and
Two data as well.
wvvvv
Health Impacts
The impact of displacement on individual well-being has been extensively
documented. Brenner's aggregate studies first linked unemployment to increased
morbidity and mortality rates (Brenner, 1973; 1979; 1983). Studies at the
individual level of analysis corroborate these aggregate findings (Hepworth,
1980; D'arcy & Siddique, 1985) and longitudinal research has charted the
long-term health consequences of displaced workers (Cobb & Kasl, 1979;
Grayson, 1985, Liem & Rayman, 1982). Research has also examined the
relationship between ill health and early retirement (Yelin et. al. 1999).
Given the association between job loss and declining health, the CLAND study
incorporated a series of questions to assess respondent's own health, as well as
the health of their spouse and dependents. Study participants were also asked
about the frequency of visits to physicians and mental health workers, and their
use of prescription drugs.

At the 21-month interview, respondents’ ratings of their own health
remained positive, averaging 5.6 on a seven-point scale. Perceptions of spousal
health were identical, while dependents' health was rated as being somewhat
better (6.3). Although the majority of respondents (58.2%) reported no
prescription drug use, several variations across selected subgroups were noted.
In addition to the anticipated low rates of prescription drug use among males
and younger respondents, CRP decliners also reported lower levels. In contrast,
prescription drug use was highest amongst those from the Administrative Support
and Administrative/Foreign Service categories, those with less than high-school
education, low income earners, and both retired and unemployed individuals.
Visits to health professionals serve as another indicator of health status.
Frequent visits to a doctor often signal a problem in either mental or physical
well-being. Participants in the CLAND study reported a median average of one
visit to a health professional over the preceding 6-month period. Contact
occurrence was significantly lower for participants living in Quebec, males,
individuals with higher personal incomes, greater locus of control , and those
satisfied with their CRP decision. Unemployed respondents reported the highest
levels of contact with health professionals, surpassing even retirees on that
measure.
The importance of gender and age in health behaviors was apparent for several
demographic characteristics at Wave Two. In the case of prescription drug use,
after controlling for gender, association continues for age, education, CRP
type, and personal income variables. For other variables, interaction effects
are noted: among males, those with lower household incomes used medication most
often, as did those who were either unemployed or retired.
Age controls produced a few interesting differences between subgroups of
primarily older workers. Among participants over 45 years of age, prescription
drug use was significantly more common among CRP takers than decliners.
Occupational differences were also apparent among workers in the 45+ age band:
Administrative Support workers reported elevated levels of drug use. Related to
the occupational patterns was the same pattern of relatively high drug use among
females in that same age range.
Family Impacts
Sociological research on the impacts of unemployment and labour adjustment
have identified the mitigating role of social support resources (Cobb & Kasl,
1979; Linn et. al., 1985; House, 1981; Binns & Mars, 1984; Liem & Liem,
1988). However, it has also been commonly recognized that one of the paradoxes
of unemployment and occupational stress is the destructive force these
conditions have on the very sources of support that are most necessary to cope
with stress - principally the nuclear family (House, 1981; Hayes & Nutman,
1981; Powell & Driscoll, 1973; Grayson, 1985)
The CLAND study examines both the ameliorative role of social support and the
impacts of labour adjustment on the families of affected employees. A social
support scale was created by combining five questions related to respondents’
access and connection to non-spousal sources of support. A separate three-item
scale measured the degree of emotional and instrumental assistance respondents
receive from their spouses.
The family portrait of CLAND respondents is consistent with the somewhat
older age profile of the sample. The large majority are married or in common law
relationships. Almost half of the households consist of just the respondent and
their partner. The median number of dependents living at home is one.
A high percentage of respondents (61%) have a working spouse; thirty-six
percent of spouses are either retired or homemakers. That the labour force
participation of spouses is more than double that of respondents is striking,
particularly given the demographics of the CLAND sample. Table 6 illustrates the
relationship between respondents’ work status and that of their spouses.
Interestingly the group that would most likely to require additional income
support from their spouse, the unemployed, are the least likely to have it, save
for retirees. Further examination of spousal employment would suggest that this
relationship is also significantly influenced by respondents’ age. Spousal
employment declines with age, dropping dramatically to 37 percent for
respondents over 55 years of age and their work status.
Table 6: Spousal Employment by Respondent Work Status
| |
Spouses` Wave 3 Employment Status |
|
|
Respondent |
% Working |
% Unemployed |
% Retired |
% Other |
Total n |
|
Unemployed |
63.8 |
4.7 |
13.6 |
17.8 |
225 |
|
Working |
75.4 |
3.6 |
6.5 |
14.5 |
130 |
|
Working at DND |
80.5 |
2.8 |
6.7 |
10.0 |
264 |
|
Retired |
39.4 |
2.2 |
36.7 |
21.7 |
426 |
|
Total n |
622 |
32 |
213 |
177 |
1045 |
In general, most respondents reported high levels of social and spousal
support, averaging 5.6 and 6.2 respectively, on a scale ranging from one to
seven. The particularly strong perceptions registered for spousal support
limited the analysis that could be performed due to the scarcity of cases in the
bottom half of the scale. The greater variation noted for social support allowed
the researchers to examine its relationships with other variables.
Social support was associated with various demographic factors; it decreased
with age, was higher among females, and was significantly lower among residents
of Quebec. Although the first two associations are consistent with the social
support literature, the regional finding was surprising.

The connection between social support and economic outcomes was also clearly
borne out by the data. Individuals who were unemployed reported the lowest
levels of support as did those whose economic condition had worsened over the
previous year and people who were least satisfied with their CRP decision.

What the Spouses Had to Say
As a compliment to the quantitative respondent data, the CLAND project
conducted a series of focus groups with the spouses of CRP recipients to probe
their impressions of the impacts of departure on the employees and their
families. Conducted in the Spring of 1998, the focus group results correspond to
a point in time roughly equivalent to the 21-month interval. A total of eight
focus group sessions were scheduled at four metropolitan centres where National
Defence had a major presence: Halifax, Victoria, Montreal, and Ottawa. At each
location, separate sessions were held for male and female spouses. The focus
groups were conducted by Ekos Research, working closely with the CLAND research
team. Group size averaged nine participants, falling below that level on only
two occasions where difficulties were experienced recruiting male spouses.
A considerable breadth was noted in the picture of adjustment received from
the spouses, the variation driven largely by the proximity of the departing
employee to the normal retirement age. As almost half of our survey sample was
over 50 years of age and thus tended to view departure as an early transition
into retirement, their spouses reported family experiences typical of that
adjustment. For most in that situation, the impacts of departure were deemed as
relatively moderate.
A different story emerges for younger individuals for whom retirement was not
an option. As documented in the Wave One report, CRP recipients universally
invested the bulk of their buyout monies into RRSP accounts in order to take
advantage of available tax shelter provisions. Consequently, younger workers
were often faced with a pressing cash-flow problem and a strong requirement to
re-enter the workforce. Individuals successful in finding work shortly after
leaving National Defence seem to have parlayed their departure into a positive
experience, whereas the spouses of individuals experiencing a prolonged job
search tend to describe a more difficult adjustment for the employee and their
families.
On the decision
One message that echoed loudly from spouses across all age bands was a
critical view of the work environment in National Defence during the period
leading up to the CRP reductions. The negative atmosphere and climate of
insecurity created by the cuts were identified by the spouses as significant
factors behind employees’ decisions to accept the buyout. Indeed, many spouses
supported that decision as the preferred alternative to remaining in an
increasingly stressful workplace.
Generally, spouses whose partners were close to retirement were less
apprehensive than those whose spouse would have to seek work. Younger couples
were more dependent on the DND paycheque and more concerned with the prospect of
its loss.
On the post-departure outcomes
The information from the focus groups provides a fuller, more descriptive
sense of the post-DND work history experienced by our sample. The spouses
confirmed that departure meant a direct shift into retirement for many older
workers. For a large number of older workers, however, it represents
"semi-retirement" as they explored different means of supplementing
their retirement income. This information contrasts somewhat with the survey
results and suggests an under-reporting of paid employment or self-employment by
retirees.
For non-retirees, an extremely diverse mixture of outcomes is described. A
number of employees gained employment shortly after departure but the majority
seem to have fallen short of matching their DND earnings. Forays into
self-employment appear to have been especially unstable and disappointing to the
spouses - another piece of information not fully conveyed in the survey results.
On the financial impacts
With the exception of those cases in which the CRP recipient gained
equivalent or better employment shortly after leaving National Defence, most
spouses report a worsening of household financial conditions and a heightened
concern about the family’s financial future. Significant cutbacks in
expenditures are consistently reported – in contrast somewhat to the survey
results in which only one-third report having to make cutbacks. For spouses of
retirees who have prepared for that inevitability, the impacts are relatively
minor in comparison to the severe decline cited by spouses of younger workers
and older workers less-prepared for a comfortable retirement. As one spouse from
Victoria stated "...we sacrificed on the way up and we were almost there
only to have the rug pulled out from under us - just when it looked like we
might be comfortable".
Another theme emerging from the discussion of financial impacts was the need
for spouses to increase their financial contribution. Many spoke of the
increased importance of their income as means of compensating for the reduced
cash-flow caused by their partner’s departure from DND. The greater reliance
on the spousal earnings was expressed by both genders. This would seem to be
supported by the survey finding that the rate of spousal employment was twice
that of respondents.
On the family and the relationship
The most poignant contribution of the focus group research was generated by
the discussion of the emotional impact that the CRP has had on the recipient,
the spouse, and relationships within the family. Focus group participants showed
surprising candour in recounting the emotional impacts of the adjustment process
in the period leading up to the cuts and in their aftermath. Prior to departure,
the uncertainty and stress in the workplace appears to have been very difficult
for spouses and employees alike.
In each of the eight sessions, several participants spoke of the sadness
associated with watching their partner’s self-esteem decline as they sought to
acquire meaningful work. Spouses described the emotional support they provided
in response to the lost confidence, isolation, and depression being exhibited by
their partners. For many families this was their first experience with
displacement and they were not prepared for the stress and marital tension it
brought.
The exception, again, was found among spouses of older, retiring employees
who endured only the normal withdrawal symptoms associated with retirement. In
those instances, many reported a renewed closeness in their relationship.
There was little evidence that the adjustment process had any deleterious
impacts on children. Due to the overall age of our sample, presence of children
in the household was low. Only a few spouses commented that their offspring were
adversely affected by the family’s reduced cash-flow or parental stress.
The spouses also strongly suggested that they could have benefited from
counselling sessions to prepare them for the emotional changes associated with
job loss. Most seemed to have under-estimated the impact that job loss could
exact on their partners and themselves
Conclusion
The third installment of the CLAND study presents information on the
adjustment process at a point twenty-one months from the time at which
individuals were initially offer a departure incentive under the Civilian
Reduction Program. The Wave Three data provide valuable information on the
employment outcomes of CRP recipients and the first opportunity to discern
potential longitudinal effects.
Almost two years from time-of-offer, all CRP takers have left National
Defence and are a considerable distance into their post-departure adjustment.
For the largest portion of the departing employees, around 40 percent, that
transition has represented an early shift into retirement. For an overwhelming
majority of retirees, a complete withdrawal from paid employment is reported,
although qualitative information generated from focus groups held with spouses
suggests the practice of various income-supplementing pursuits.
The Wave Three results demonstrate a slight but steady growth in the
proportion of CRP takers who have secured a foothold in the external labour
market. Approximately 28 percent reported employment at the 21-month interval,
up from 20 percent at Wave Two. Among those who were working at Wave Three, 40
percent were in traditional wage employment (full or part-time) while 34 percent
claimed self-employment and 26 were engaged in contract work.
Several findings continue to support the assertion that human capital plays a
large role in determining employment outcomes. Success in finding work was
positively associated with increased educational achievement, higher ratings of
skill portability, and Scientific/Professional designation.
A more troubling finding emerging from the study is that fully one-quarter of
former DND employees were unemployed almost two years from the date of CRP
offer. Age has a significant impact on employment; workers in the 35-54 age band
were almost twice as likely as younger or older workers to be unemployed. The
CLAND results also reveal that the displaced DND employees are turning to the
state for assistance. Sixty percent of non-retirees reporting having applied for
EI benefits and 42 percent of that number were receiving EI at the time of the
21-month interview.
The adverse impacts of job loss are noted in several measures of individual
well-being where the unemployed exhibit statistically significant differences
from the balance of the sample; in areas of health, economic circumstances,
psychological well-being and social support.
The "economic honeymoon" affect described in earlier reports
continues for CRP takers at the 21-month interval. Individuals who accepted the
CRP were significantly more likely to identify economic improvements over the
previous year. Interestingly, however, the gap between CRP takers and decliners
has closed sharply over the course of the study, owing primarily to a decline
reported by the unemployed and the retired. A relatively poor economic
assessment persists among those who remain Departmental employees. They are
still almost three times as likely to report a decline in economic conditions
than to have indicated an improvement in this area.
The results from a series of focus groups conducted with the spouses of CRP
recipients provide a complimentary perspective to the survey findings. The
spouses affirmed the relatively modest impacts experienced by the large number
of the sample for whom departure meant retirement but also provide insight into
the significant emotional and financial impacts registered by the smaller
portion of recipients wrestling with displacement.
Bibliography
Beck, N. (1992) Shifting Gears: Thriving in the New Economy, Harper
Collins.
Binns,D. and Mars,G. (1984) "Family, Community, and Unemployment: A
Study in Change", Sociological Review, 32, 662-695.
Blau, D.M. and Robins, P.K. (1990) "Job Search Outcomes for the Employed
and Unemployed", Journal of Political Economy, 98 ,June: 637-55.
Bolles, R.N. (1986) What Color is Your Parachute?: A Practical Manual for
Job Hunters and Career Changers, Berkeley CA: Ten Speed Press.
Brenner, M.H. (1979) ''Health and the National Economy'' in Ferman and Gordus,
op.cit.
Brenner, M.H. (1983) ''Mortality and Economic Instability: Detailed Analyses
for Britain'', International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 13 No. 4.
Brockner J. et al (1985) "Layoffs, Self-Esteem and Survivor Guilt:
Motivational, Effective, and Attitudinal Consequences", Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (36), 229-244.
Catalano, R. and Dooley, D. (1977), "Economic Predictors of Depressed
Mood and Stressful life-events in a Metropolitan Community", Journal of
Health and Social Behaviour, 18: 292-307.
Cobb, S. and Kasl, S. (1979) ''Some Mental Consequences of Plant Closings and
Job Loss'', in Ferman and Gordus, op.cit.
Crompton, S. (1994) "A Note on the Self-Initiated Training of Job
Losers", Perspectives on Labour and Income, Statistics Canada, Spring,
catalogue 75-001E.
D’arcy, C. and Siddique, C.M. (1985) "Unemployment and health: An
Analysis of Canada Health Service Data", International Journal of Health
Services, 15,4,609-635.
Ekos Research Associates (1997) Civilian Labour Adjustment in National
Defence: Wave One Field Report
Ferman, L. and Gordus, J. eds. (1979) Mental Health and the Economy,
Kalamazoo: WE Upjohn Institute.
Grayson, P. (1985) ''The Closure of a Factory and Its Impact on Health'', International
Journal of Health Services Vol. 15, No. 1.
Grayson J.P. (1985) Corporate Strategy & Plant Closures: the SKF
Experience, Toronto: Our Times Publishing.
Hamermesh, D.S. (1989) "What Do We Know About Displacement in the
U.S.?", Industrial Relations, 28 (Winter): 51-59.
Hayes, J. and Nutman, P. (1981) Understanding the Unemployed, New
York: Tavistock Publications
Hepworth, S.J. (1980), Moderating factors of the psychological impact of
unemployment", Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53:139-145.
Hoffman, W.S., V. Lee Hamilton, C.L. Broman and D. Rauma (1991)
''Unemployment Depression and Self-Blame Among Autoworkers'', paper presented at
the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, 1991.
House, J.S. (1981) Work Stress and Social Support, Don Mills: Addison
Wesley.
Jackson , P.R, and Warr, P.B. (1984), "Unemployment and Psychological
Ill-health: the moderating role of duration and age", Psychological
Medicine, 14, 605-614.
Jacobson, L.S., LaLonde, R.J., & Sullivan, D.G. (1993) "Earnings
Losses of Displaced Workers", American Economic Review, 83
(September): 685-709.
Jacobson, L.S., LaLonde, R.J., & Sullivan, D.G. (1993) The Costs of
Worker Dislocation, Kalamazoo,MI: WE Upjohn.
Jones, S.R.G and Kuhn, P. (1994) "Is Employed Job Search Really More
Effective" McMaster University.
Kessler, R.C. Turner, J.B., and House, J.S. (1987) "Effects of
Unemployment on Health in a Community Survey" Journal of Health and Social
Behavior 28: 51-59.
Krahn, H. (1991) ''Non-standard Work Arrangements'' Perspectives on Labour
and Income, Winter, Statistics Canada, catalogue 75-001.
Lauzon, D. (1995) "Worker Displacement: Trends, Characteristics, and
Policy Responses" HRDC Applied Research Branch.
Liem, G.R. and Rayman,P. (1982), "Health and Social Costs of
Unemployment", American Psychologist, 37,10:1116-1123.
Liem, R. and Liem, J.H. (1988) "Psychological Effects of Unemployment on
Workers and Their Families" Journal of Social Issues 44:87-105.
Linn, M. Stein,S. and Sandifer,R. (1985) "Effects of Unemployment on
Mental and Physical Health", Amercian Journal of Public Health, 75,
5, 502-506.
Mackay, H (1993) Sharkproof: Getting the Job You Want, New York:
Harper Collins.
Marks, M.L. and Mirvis, P. (1992) "Rebuilding After the Merger: Dealing
With Survivor Sickness", Organizational Dynamics, (21)2, 18-32.
Ontario Ministry of Labour (1993) The Displaced Workers of Ontario: How Do
They Fare? .
Noer, D.M. (1993) Healing the Wounds: Overcoming the Trauma of Layoffs and
Revitalizing Downsized Organizations, San Francisco, Josey-Bass Publishers.
Picot, G. and W. Pyper, (1993)Permanent Layoffs and Displaced Workers:
Cyclical Sensitivity, Concentration, and Experience Following the Layoff,
Statistics Canada Analytical Studies Branch, Research Paper Series.
Powell, D. and Driscoll, P. (1973) "Middle Class Professional Face
Unemployment", Society, 10, 18-26.
Ruhm, C. (1991) "The Time Profile of Displacement-Induced Changes in
Unemployment and Earnings" in Addison, J.T. (ed.) Job Displacement:
Consequences and Implications for Policy, Detroit: Wayne State University
Press.
Ruhm, C. (1992) "Are Workers Permanently Scarred by Job
Displacements?", American Economic Review, March, 319-324.
Seitchik, A. and Zornitsky, J. (1989) From One Job to the Next: Worker
Adjustment in a Changing Labour Market, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment
Research.
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (1995) Employment Statistics for the
Federal Public Service: April 1, 1998 – March 31, 1999, Ottawa.
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (1995) "The Civilian Reduction
Program at the Department of National Defence: Factors Affecting Early Departure
Decisions", Ottawa.
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (1994) "Consultations Among
Civilian Employees Regarding DND Civilian Reduction Program", Ottawa,
(prepared by Optima).
Weissman, M.M., Bruce, M.L., Leaf, P.J., Florio, L.P., and Holzer, C. (1991)
"Affective Disorders" in L.N. Robins and D.A. Regier, (eds). Psychiatric
Disorders in America. New York: Free Press.
Yelin, E, Trupin,L., et al (1999) "Work, Retirement, and Health of
Californians: A Mixed Story", University of California at San Francisco
Appendix
1: Scale Construction and Validation Procedures
In a number of instances, items were combined to establish indices of
particular concepts. These indices were of two types: Likert scales and combined
measures. In both instances, questions have response categories along a
continuum ranging from 1 to 7, where low values generally mean strong negative
responses and high values denote strong positive responses. In cases where the
scale was reversed, item codes were transposed prior to the calculation of the
final summary measure. Thus, for all the indices cited in this report, low
values are strongly negative while high values are strongly positive responses
to a given topic. To retain the original 7-point scale and accommodate missing
data, the summary measures were calculated by averaging the individual item
values.
The Likert scales require a minimum of four variables to generate meaningful
alpha coefficients used to measure inter-item reliability. In situations where
the condition for Likert-type scales could not be met, but two or three similar
variables were moderately correlated, the items were combined to create a
stronger overall measure. The following is a more detailed explanation of each
summary measure constructed for this report.
In all, seven Likert scales were created:
Locus of control: scale consists of five questions with response
categories that range from "strongly disagree" to "strongly
agree". Study participants were asked to give their feelings on the
following statements: (1) "many of the unhappy things in people’s
lives are partly due to bad luck"; (2) "getting a good job depends
mainly on being in the right place at the right time"; (3) "many
times I feel I have little influence over the things that happen to
me"; (4) "I just don’t get breaks, and there’s no reason to
believe I will in the future"; and (5) "I don’t expect to get
what I really want". Scale reliability, as calculated by Cronbach’s
alpha coefficient, is moderate but acceptable (a
=.65).
Self-esteem: scale is comprised of four statements in which the
individual rates each along a continuum from "almost never true"
to "almost always true". The statements deal with whether the
respondents: (1) felt that they were "...a person of worth, at least on
an equal plane with others"; (2) had "...a number of good
qualities"; (3) "...able to do things as well as most other
people";, and (4) take "...a positive attitude towards
myself". Cronbach’s measure for internal reliability is fair for the
self-esteem scale (a =.75).
Personal aspirations: scale is constructed from five questions
identifying what respondents feel is most important in a job. Responses
range from "not at all important" to "extremely
important" and include questions on the significance of: (1)
"having work that is challenging"; (2) "having the
opportunity to learn new things"; (3) "using your skills to the
maximum"; (4) "having the opportunity to make your own
decisions"; and (5) "extending your range of abilities". The
reliability coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) for the personal aspirations
scale is high (a =.77).
Depression: scale is measured by 15 items asking the respondent to rate
how they felt over the past month. Individuals could respond on a range from
"rarely/none of the time" to "most/all of the time" for
the following statements: (1) "...been able to concentrate on whatever
you’re doing"; (2) "...lost much sleep over worry"; (3)
"...felt that you are playing a useful part in things"; (4)
"...felt capable of making decisions about things"; (5)
"...felt constantly under strain";, (6) "...felt you couldn’t
overcome your difficulties"; (7) "...been able to enjoy your
normal day-to-day activities"; (8) "...been able to face up to
your problems"; (9) "...been feeling unhappy and depressed";
(10) "...been losing confidence in yourself"; (11) "...been
thinking of yourself as a worthless person"; (12) "...been feeling
reasonably happy all things considered"; (13) "...had thoughts of
ending your life", (14) "...did not feel like eating; your
appetite was poor"; and (15) "...had crying spells". The
summary measure for depression has a high alpha coefficient (a
=.90), indicating strong internal item reliability.
Anxiety: like the depression measure, this scale assesses the individuals’
internal state over the past 30 days. Study participants could choose
answers ranging from "not at all" to "very much so" on
questions which asked about the extent to which they felt: (1)
"calm"; (2) "tense"; (3) "nervous"; (4)
"relaxed"; (5) "worried"; (6) "frightened";
and (7) "stressed overall". Internal reliability coefficient for
the anxiety scale is high (a =.89).
Spousal support: scale measures the degree of emotional and instrumental
assistance respondents receive from their partners. Responses to the three
questions range along a continuum from "no support at all" to
"extremely supportive" and include questions on the extent of
"trust", "emotional support" and compatibility on
"family objectives" respondents have in their relationship.
Internal reliability for the spousal support measure is fair (a
=.77).
Economic condition: scale measures the extent to which respondents and
their households are economically worse off, the same, or better off than
they were a year ago. Study participants were specifically asked about their
"savings", "debt load", and "standard of
living" over the past year. Internal reliability for this measure is
moderate (a =.66) as indicated by Cronbach’s
alpha.
Social support: scale was created by combining five variables designed to
determine (a) the extent to which respondents access informal social
contacts beyond their spouse/partner, (b) whether they can rely on someone
for emergency cash, (c) whether their friends and family would make it
difficult to relocate, (d) whether there is someone aside from their spouse
who they can trust for advice, and (e) whether they have positive
relationships with their coworkers. Correlations ranged from 0.08 to 0.35
for these variables, while the internal reliability for this measure is
moderate (a =.63).
Work orientation was initially conceived as a 7-item scale inquiring about
respondent’s personal beliefs on the importance of work and achievement.
Individual scale items covered questions such as: "...it is important to
have a regular job", "I like to work", and "in the future I
expect to succeed in what concerns me most". However, Cronbach’s alpha
for this scale was low (a =.39), indicating poor
internal reliability. Further investigation of the individual questions revealed
that respondent’s answers were consistently grouped at the high end of the
response scale, leaving very little item variance. This, combined with low
correlations amongst the variables, suggested that an item analysis would be
preferable to the summary scale technique.
In addition to the Likert type scales, several combined measures were formed:
Achievement orientation: three questions inquired about respondents’
attitudes towards work, with response choices ranging form "almost
never true" to "almost always true". Study participants were
asked whether: (1) "I do my best work when my job assignments are
fairly difficult", (2) "I try to perform better than my
co-workers" and (3) "I take moderate risks and stick my neck out
to get ahead at work". Correlations amongst these three variables range
from 0.18 to 0.26.
Happiness: two global questions dealing with the individual’s level of
happiness and life satisfactions were combined (r = .69) to make one overall
happiness variable.
Portability of skills: respondents were probed about the value of their
skills in the job market and their relevance outside the federal public
service. The two questions were combined (r = .18) to form a single variable
reflecting skill portability.
Literacy: two questions tapping language and numerical skills formed a
composite index of overall literacy skill (r = .51).
Satisfaction with CRP decision: an overall measure (r = .49) of
respondent’s satisfaction with their decision whether or not to accept the
CRP was derived from two specific questions: one on direct satisfaction with
decision, the other one on propensity to make the same decision again.
Appendix 2: Data Collection Technique
All interviews in the CLAND study were conducted by Ekos Research Associates
under contract to the Union of National Defence Employees. Ekos employed a
computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) system to perform the
interviews. The CATI system produces high quality data through its process of
instantaneous data entry and its capability to follow the complex skip patterns
embedded in the questionnaire.
The number of callbacks (repeated attempts to contact respondents) was
specified as ten, a level that exceeds industry standards. The callback rate was
set high in order to minimize attrition. The telephone interviews averaged 28
minutes in length, two minutes under the allocated time.
The research project also anticipated a requirement to respond to concerns
that participants might express regarding any aspect of the adjustment process.
Field staff were instructed to direct respondents to different project
resources, depending on the nature of their question. The sources of assistance
included: a 1-800 number for the CLAND research team, the DND hot-line, and the
Ekos survey center. Although a few of individuals did request contact from a
project representative, the number was very low (under 40).
|